How will you relate the scenario to the conduct of a quantitative research study

answer:

“For the court to be satisfied that the investigator acted lawfully and within the bounds of legally prescribed authority, the judge needs to hear the investigator describe their thinking processes to form reasonable grounds, or in some emergency cases, to have a reasonable suspicion that justifies the action taken.”

An effective strategy for learning any new skill is to define it and break it down into logical steps, establishing a progression that can be followed and repeated to reach the desired results. The process of investigation is no exception and can be effectively explained and learned in this manner. In this chapter, you will learn how each of the following issues relates to the process of investigation.

The distinction between investigative tasks and investigative thinking

The progression of the investigative process

The distinction between tactical investigative and strategic investigative responses

The concepts of event classification and offence recognition

The threat vs. action response dilemma

The distinction between active events and inactive events

The connection of active events and Level 1 priority results to the powers afforded under exigent circumstance

The Response Transition Matrix (RTM) and the critical need to transition from tactical response to strategic response

Explanation:

sana makatulong, pero try mo parin Isearch

Research involving children.The Junior Doctors in the respiratory unit at the Oxford Children Hospital want to conduct a study of antibiotic

Explanation:

#CarryOnLearning

#answerForTrees